August 25, 2025
Crystal Palace triggered the ban on the Europa League: “Merit is made meaningless”

Crystal Palace triggered the ban on the Europa League: “Merit is made meaningless”

Crystal Palace asked the UEFA to scrap its “poorly designed” rules for multi-club ownership (MCO) and asked whether they received a fair hearing before the judicial court of sports after their appointment against downgrading from the European League.

On Monday, CAS confirmed that UEFA’s decision to reduce the FA Cup winner into the conference league after the decision that John Textor held shares and had a decisive influence on Palace and Lyon, which also qualified for the Europa League. Since then he has sold his 43% participation in the South London Club to his US businessman Woody Johnson.

Advertising

Related: Spurs open up Talks when they try to beat Arsenal to the palace attack

The Palace, which is expected to be missed in the conference league in a strongly formulated explanation on Tuesday in a strongly formulated explanation of up to 20 million GBP, in a strongly formulated explanation in which he will compete against Norway against Fredrikstad or Midtjylland by Denmark this month to take a To apply for legal advice to seek against compensation against compensation against compensation.

Palace described the decision to sank it as evidence that “sporting merits will be meaningless” and claimed that “certain clubs, organizations and individuals have a unique privilege and a unique power”.

“This growing and unhealthy influence has shaken the hopes and dreams of followers of Crystal Palace and is not good for strenuous teams all over Europe who compete for progress when rules and sanctions are used unevenly in the soundproof manner,” says the explanation.

Advertising

“Multi-club structures are hidden behind the charade of a” blind trust “, while clubs like ours who have no connection to another club at all are prevented from playing in the same competition. In order to tighten the injustice, clubs that apparently have enormous informal arrangements are allowed to participate and even play against each other.”

Several clubs that are part of MCOS were able to use their possession of blind trusts for the bypass of UEFA regulations, even though Palace missed the original period from UEFA. It is assumed that CAS has presented evidence that only members of the European Club Association (ECA) have been informed that the deadline could be extended by May 31. This argument was rejected by the CAS committee, in which the UEFA regulations were clear and clubs that are not compliant on the evaluation date do not offer flexibility.

The regulations have been updated last year so that clubs that are part of MCOS take part in various UEFA competitions, but Palace believes that further changes from the management committee of European football are required.

“A combination of poorly designed regulations and its unequal application means that our brilliant fans are withdrawn from the chance to see this team for the first time in our history in the Europa League,” she said. “This should be a turning point for football. UEFA must meet his mandate to adopt coherent rules that are properly communicated and used, with reasonable healing times to solve uncertainty and consistent sanctions, which deals with an appropriate appeal procedure alike.

Advertising

“The European Court of Justice has made it clear that the similar decisions will be subjected to national courts in a larger examination in the future. Only then will every team be given fairness and a proper procedure.”

The palace also criticized their treatment at CAS, whereby frustration was understood that they refused to consider what they were for decisive evidence of the correspondence between the ECA and some of its clubs about the extended period.

“While we respect the CAS Tribunal members, the process should be severely restricted and in our case almost impossible to receive a fair hearing. The rejection of all proposals for disclosure in order to obtain corresponding parties, the refusal to enable testimony from the parties involved, and the general lack of formality and respect for legal applications that were properly appealed, can be adequately requested, the outphen listed. “

CAS and UEFA were contacted for a comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *